South Platte and Metro Basin Hydrology

This story provides a summary of South Platte and Metro Basin hydrology in order to provide background for understanding water resources issues in the basin.

See the Instructions page for how to view this story. Created by the Open Water Foundation.

Hydrology Concepts - The Hydrologic Cycle

Hydrology is the study of water.

As a science, hydrology has evolved in response to the need to understand Earth's complex water systems and help solve water problems. The supply of water available for human use is limited by nature. Although there is plenty of water on Earth, it is not always in the right place at the right time and of the right quality.

Hydrology encompasses the occurrence, distribution, movement and properties of water and its relationship with the environment within each phase of the hydrologic cycle, shown at right. The hydrologic cycle, or water cycle, is a continuous process by which water is purified by evaporation and transported from the Earth's surface (including the oceans) into the atmosphere and back to the land and oceans. All of the physical, chemical and biological processes involving water as it travels its various paths in the atmosphere (e.g., condensation and precipitation), over and beneath the Earth's surface (e.g., infiltration and snowmelt runoff) and through growing plants (e.g., transpiration) are studied.

There are many pathways water may take in its continuous cycle of falling as rainfall or snowfall and returning to the atmosphere. Water may be captured for millions of years in polar ice caps. It may flow to rivers and finally to the sea. It may soak into the soil to be evaporated directly from the soil surface as it dries or be transpired by growing plants. It may percolate through the soil to ground water reservoirs (aquifers) to be stored or it may flow to wells or springs or back to streams by seepage. The cycle for water may be short or it may take millions of years.

~ From the USGS Water Science School.

Hydrology Concepts - Hydrographs

Hydrographs summarize river flows over a period of time, using a “time series” of data. A time series is a time-ordered sequence of dates (possibly also with time of day) with corresponding data values. Hydrographs provide a way to understand variation, trends and relationships in water data. Other data types can be similarly graphed, but the word “hydrograph” is typically used when presenting water depth, flow and/or volume over time.

In Colorado, average annual statewide precipitation is 16 inches, with most regions receiving 12-16 inches. The mountainous areas of the state receive more water. Most areas above 10,000 feet in elevation receive 25 inches or more annually, mostly in the form of snow. The snowpack typically builds up in the early spring from storms originating in the Pacific Ocean that move eastward. The snowpack begins to melt in April and feeds into the State’s rivers. Peak runoff from snowmelt occurs in May and June. According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), approximately 80% of river runoff comes from snowmelt. The remainder comes from rainfall and infiltration from groundwater (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.4-6).

Understanding snowmelt amount and timing is critical to water resources planning. The amount of snow and rain that feeds into rivers varies within a single year and also from year to year. Hydrographs show the rate of flow (discharge) versus time past a specific point in a river, typically a streamgage (discussed in a later section). The rate of flow is typically expressed in cubic feet per second (cfs).

This interactive visualization shows five annual hydrographs from a streamgage on Boulder Creek. Each line represents a year of flow data and shows the variability that can occur from year to year. To select/deselect years on the plot, click on the year in the legend at the bottom. Note that even though these years represent a wide range of flows observed on Boulder Creek at this location, flows are most variable from mid-April to August. (Source: CDSS HydroBase)

The year classifications (e.g., "Much Below Normal") are based on USGS terminology and are categorized as follows:

  • Less than 10th percentile = Much Below Normal
  • 10th - 24th percentile = Below Normal
  • 25th - 75th percentile = Normal
  • 76th - 90th percentile = Above Normal
  • Greater than 90th percentile = Much Above Normal

Hydrology Concepts - Variability

Hydrologic variability occurs across space and time. Within the South Platte Basin, flows can vary between sub-basins within the same year, with one sub-basin experiencing drought and another experiencing adequate water supplies. Variation can occur because of elevation, regional weather patterns, water storage projects, impacts of specific storm events and other reasons.

This interactive visualization shows annual flow volume in acre-feet from 1950 to 2011 for 32 streamgages in the basin, representing the South Platte River and many of its tributaries (Source: StateMod, Natural Flow time series). Streamgages on the South Platte River are ordered from upstream to downstream and tributaries are generally arranged in order from where their confluences are with the South Platte River. Within a streamgage, average volumes are ranked and placed into percentile categories as follows:

  • Less than 10th percentile = Much Below Normal
  • 10th - 24th percentile = Below Normal
  • 25th - 75th percentile = Normal
  • 76th - 90th percentile = Above Normal
  • Greater than 90th percentile = Much Above Normal

Click on the categories within the legend to select/deselect the categories of flow conditions. Note that 2002 was a severe drought across the entire basin and resulted in many changes, including the adoption of water conservation practices. See the Drought section for more information.

It is important to recognize that the data used in an analysis can be impacted by human actions. Streamgage measurements reflect the impacts of diversions, reservoir releases and other impacts. Therefore, evaluating streamgage data also indirectly reflects other conditions in the basin. Annual data can also be impacted by extreme events. For example, a streamgage may indicate drought conditions for the majority of the year and one large rain event may skew the annual result (e.g., the September 2013 flood event centered on the Colorado Front Range). It may be necessary to view data at finer detail, such as a monthly interval, to fully understand conditions. Fully understanding drought conditions requires evaluation of snowpack, precipitation, natural flows, reservoir storage and other data.

Hydrology Concepts - Watersheds

A watershed is an area of land that drains all the streams and rainfall to a common outlet, such as the outflow of a reservoir or any point along a stream channel. A watershed can also be referred to as a drainage basin or catchment; it is also possible to think of a watershed as a precipitation collector. Ridges and hills that separate two watersheds are called the drainage divide. In Colorado, the Continental Divide is an example of a drainage divide at the largest scale. Water that falls west of the Divide will eventually make its way to the Pacific Ocean via rivers like the Colorado River. Water that falls east of the Divide will eventually make its way to the Atlantic Ocean via rivers like the South Platte and Arkansas. Natural drainage features may be modified by human impacts such as dams, tunnels, pumping, canals and other infrastructure.

A watershed consists of surface water--lakes, streams, reservoirs and wetlands--and all the underlying groundwater. Larger watersheds consist of many smaller watersheds. The size of the watershed depends on the outflow point: all of the land that drains water to the outflow point is the watershed for that outflow point (USGS Water Science School). It is helpful to locate streamgages at the outflow point of important water supply watersheds or stream confluences.

There are a number of watershed datasets. A common one is the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) from the U.S. Geological Survey, which is a nationwide dataset. Here, watersheds are called hydrologic units and form a standardized system for organizing, collecting, managing and reporting hydrologic information. Hydrologic units are arranged in a nested, hierarchical system with each unit in the system identified using a unique code. Hydrologic unit codes (HUC) are developed using a progressive two-digit system where each successively smaller areal unit is identified by adding two digits to the identifying code of the parent basin. An example of this hierarchy is shown below.

Source: Watershed Boundary Dataset

The WBD contains eight levels of progressive hydrologic units identified by unique 2- to 16-digit codes. The dataset is complete for the United States to the 12-digit hydrologic unit. The map at right shows HUC10 watersheds in the South Platte Basin.

The State of Colorado classifies watersheds into divisions (the South Platte Basin is Division 01) and districts, which correspond to basins associated with water administration. Water-related data in the State's HydroBase database, such as diversion records and water rights, are assigned a "Water District Identifier" or WDID; the first two digits of the WDID are the water district number and the remaining digits indicate a structure such as a diversion headgate or reservoir. On the map at right, click on the second Layers icon in the upper left corner to toggle to a map of the water districts in the Basin. Note that the Republican River and Laramie River basins are sometimes considered with the South Platte Basin but that each has unique water resources issues.

Hydrology Concepts - Streams

Streams are the surface water conveyance features within a watershed. There are a number of stream datasets, including:

  • National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) - from the U.S. Geological Survey.
  • Source Water Route Framework (SWRF) - developed by the Division of Water Resources and derived from the NHD. The SWRF represents most streams in Colorado, in particular those with water rights or other important features. However, SWRF may not include minor streams or features that do not have a nexus with water administration.
  • Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's water quality stream segmentation dataset - classifies stream segments based on level of impairment and the reasons for impairment (E. coli, sediment, temperature, etc.).

Similar to NHD, the SWRF uses a Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) ID, an 8-digit identifier used to uniquely identify most streams in the state, rather than using the stream's common name (there are 13 streams named Dry Creek in the South Platte basin alone). SWRF provides a more simple dataset than NHD: in the SWRF each line represents a stream or river, whereas NHD provides many individual line segments for each stream or river. It is important when using these datasets to indicate the version because government agencies do periodically adjust the data.

By using the NHD linked to the SWRF, it is possible to link federal and State datasets. Datasets such as stream gages, diversion structures and instream flow rights (discussed in subsequent pages in this story) can be "referenced" to the SWRF to provide a common framework for analysis; such data work is ongoing in order to leverage the SWRF dataset.

This map shows a small section of the SWRF, representing the southwest portion of the Basin. The SWRF layer shown here is cropped because showing the full basin would result in a slower visualization. The full SWRF can be downloaded here.

Hydrology Concepts - Water Resources System

In addition to the natural hydrologic system, water resources in Colorado include human-created systems containing the following constructs:

  • legal constructs, such as water law
  • physical constructs, such as infrastructure that is used to store and convey water
  • operational constructs, such as agreements that control how systems are operated to deliver water to paying customers or shareholders

Surface water use in Colorado is administered by the Division of Water Resources (DWR). DWR is tasked with providing the dependable distribution of water in accordance with statutes, decrees and interstate compacts. DWR relies on real-time and other data from its own streamgages, as well as data from federal agencies such as U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Bureau of Reclamation, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and local entities such as cities and water districts.

A diagram representation of a water system can represent the complexities of the system in a more readable format, although the information is complex. The complexity of water resources systems is illustrated by “straight line diagrams” that combine physical and legal information to help people understand water resources systems. The diagrams are graphical linear representations of structures and water rights for a given stream system that allows a large amount of complex information to be observed at a glance. This straight line diagram of water district 04 (Big Thompson River) can also be viewed and zoomed into here. Straight line diagrams for other basins are also available.

Hydrology Concepts - Streamgages and Measuring Flows

In order to manage the water resources of Colorado it is necessary to measure the surface water flow in natural streams and water distribution infrastructure. Streamflow, also called discharge, in Colorado is measured by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Colorado Division of Water Resources (DWR), local water utilities and other entities that need to know flow amounts for reporting and operations. Sensors and data loggers (also called data collection units (DCUs) or stage discharge recorders (SDRs)) may record measurements at regular intervals and can be triggered by changing values such as a rain event. These measurements, often referred to as real-time or instantaneous, may or may not be publicly available. Real-time data are often publicly reported at 15-minute intervals, representing average conditions over that time. These values are then aggregated to longer intervals including hour and day. Average values are often suitable for water supply management operations, whereas instantaneous values may be used to monitor peak flows, environmental flows or other critical conditions.

It is important to recognize that a daily average flow, such as reported by USGS or DWR, does not mean that the flow was the same from midnight to midnight; in actuality, the flow could have varied significantly during the day and using shorter-interval data is necessary to understand the variation.

Each organization that collects data assigns a station identifier and name to the station. Multiple data sources, identifier conventions and data formats can present challenges to finding and using data.

This map shows active streamgages operated by DWR, USGS or other entities such as a municipal utility. Click on a circle for more information, including links to the website for each gage, which shows current flow conditions measured by the gage. (Source: CDSS Map Viewer, Surface Water Current Conditions layer, "Active Gage - Stream" option.)

Measuring streamflow in natural channels to a reasonable level of accuracy can be challenging. See the USGS information about how streamflow is measured. It is particularly challenging to measure flow in channels that change over time, such as the South Platte River in wide, sandy locations.

Hydrology Concepts - Diversion Headgates and Measuring Diversions

To divert water from a river into a ditch or canal, diversion structures are installed in the river. Structures divert water for several reasons: to directly deliver water to agricultural land, to carry water to other ditches, to divert water into a storage reservoir or to deliver water for other purposes such as for municipal use. Structures can be in the form of dams, pumps and headgates. Headgates are typically metal gates that are raised and lowered to allow a controlled amount of water to flow into a ditch or canal. The amount diverted depends on the water needed at that time and location, adherence to Colorado water law priority system and river conditions. Water may not be physically available if the river flow is low and may not be taken if flows are extremely high and may damage infrastructure. Diversion structures are identified using a Water District Identifier (WDID), consisting of a two-digit water district identifier and five-digit structure identifier. Each diversion structure has one or more water rights that indicate seniority, use type and amount.

Measurement of diversions occurs in various ways. Larger diversion structures may include a measurement structure such as a weir which, in combination with a water level sensor and rating, convert water level (stage) to flow (discharge); this provides a reasonable estimate of the diversion amount. Many large diversion structures now have telemetered automated data measurement. Similar to streamflow, diversion measurements may be available as real-time data (15-minute or hourly) or as longer intervals that are typically used for historical data analysis. The accuracy of diversion measurement will depend on the measurement device design and calibration and can be impacted by sediment, flow impediments such as tree trunks, technology issues and degradation of the infrastructure, such as settling, cracking and vegetation growth. Diversion records maintained by DWR indicate how much water was measured (or estimated) to have been diverted at a structure.

This map shows ditch diversion structures in the Basin, of which there are over 3,500 (note these include active, inactive and historical diversions; also note these are just ditch diversions and not diversions for other structure types, such as wells). Structures are color-coded based on water source: the 10 streams with the most diversions are colored and listed in order (i.e., the South Platte River has the most ditch diversions, followed by the Cache la Poudre River); diversions from all other streams are shown in black.

The table below lists the number of ditch diversions on each stream in the Basin for those streams that have 10 or more ditch diversion structures.

Source for table and map: Colorado's Decision Support Systems, Structures shapefile.

Hydrology Concepts - Groundwater and Measuring Water Level and Pumping

Groundwater is water that is held underground within aquifers, which are geological formations (essentially rock or soil layers). The water is contained within tiny pore spaces or cracks in the solid material. There are three types of aquifers: alluvial, sedimentary bedrock and fractured rock. Alluvial aquifers are generally composed of shallow sand and gravel deposits. They are often also called tributary aquifers because they exchange water with surface streams. Groundwater in alluvial aquifers is recharged by the infiltration of rain and snowmelt through the soil. Seepage from irrigation canals and reservoirs and inflows from nearby aquifers also contribute water. The South Platte Alluvial Aquifer is one of the largest and most utilized alluvial aquifers in Colorado (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.15-16).

Sedimentary bedrock aquifers occur deep underground primarily in sandstone and limestone. These types of aquifers are not often hydraulically connected to nearby streams. They still have recharge areas like alluvial aquifers, but these may be many miles from the actual aquifer. Deep aquifers require long periods of time to recharge – potentially thousands of years. The Denver Basin aquifer system is an example of a sedimentary bedrock aquifer (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.17).

Fractured rock aquifers occur in bedrock that contains cracks and fractures due to the folding and faulting of the rock over millions of years. These types of aquifers are common in mountainous areas. Springs occur where fractures in the rock intersect the surface (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.19).

The CDSS Map Viewer contains spatial data layers of alluvial and bedrock aquifers. To view these, click on the Geology layer, then click on the dropdown menu to click on the Alluvial Aquifer and Bedrock Aquifer sub-layers.

Groundwater is used for city water supplies, industry, irrigation, rural domestic use and livestock watering. The State Engineer has estimated that about 2 million acre-feet of groundwater is pumped and used annually, which amounts to approximately 20% of all water used in Colorado (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.29).

Groundwater from aquifers is made accessible to users via wells. Groundwater use is administered and enforced by the Division of Water Resources. This tool, from Colorado's Decision Support Systems (CDSS)shows that there are over 13,000 wells in the South Platte Basin alone. (Click on the Map tab to see locations in the Basin). Wells are numerous because they allow easy access to water. Wells are often drilled in locations that are convenient to farms and homes, whereas surface water may be located much farther away.

Small wells, such as domestic wells, are constructed after obtaining a well permit and have limited size (50 gallons per minute or less). Larger wells, such as used for agriculture and municipal supply, have a water right decree and typically have a Water District Identifier (WDID) similar to headgates, with similar diversion record data as headgate diversions. Water level data for wells is also important because it relates to the depth of wells needed to access the water, and in some areas, high water tables have resulted in flooding fields and infrastructure (see HB1278 Study: Groundwater Modeling Efforts for the Gilcrest/LaSalle and Sterling areas. Also see an update for Gilcrest and a hydrogeologic characterization report for the area.)

Hydrology Concepts - Return Flows

It may seem as though water is continuously removed from streams for agricultural, municipal and other uses and therefore the amount of water in a stream decreases as one moves downstream. However, water that is diverted for municipal, industrial or agricultural purposes that is not consumed returns to rivers and/or aquifers by surface flows or underground flows. For example, the U.S. Geological Survey has estimated that approximately only 37% of the water diverted statewide for agriculture is actually consumed (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.12).

These surface and underground flows are collectively called return flows and can be used by downstream water users. Types of return flows include runoff and infiltration from agricultural lands, runoff and infiltration from lawns and landscaping and returns from wastewater treatment plants or industry. Irrigation return flows, in particular, are often reused multiple times. Unless a municipality relies exclusively on groundwater or its water supply comes directly from a river’s headwaters, its supply includes reused water. The term “direct reuse” indicates wastewater that is directly used for municipal supply and “indirect reuse” indicates mixing wastewater with other supplies. Many cities in Colorado rely on reused (or recycled) water (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.24; Citizen's Guide to Colorado Water Conservation, p.20-21).

Water that has been diverted from other basins (transbasin diversions) contributes flows to streams and can result in some streams actually being larger than natural conditions.

This diagram, sometimes called the "snake diagram", from DWR shows how flows greatly increase downstream of Denver, which allows reuse for agriculture and other purposes. In general, municipalities seek cleaner water supplies, which often means acquiring mountain supplies. In some cases, exchanges can occur, for example, allowing a municipality to use cleaner mountain water supplies in exchange for agricultural or other users taking water from municipal water rights downstream. This allows different water providers in a region to share infrastructure and water supplies to optimize the system.

Notice how both the South Platte and Arkansas rivers do not gain large amounts of flow like rivers on the West Slope. Rather, these rivers' widths are narrower and a more consistent width along their lengths. This is an indication that the basins rely on return flows and reuse to utilize lower basin supplies to meet multiple needs.

Resources for understanding more about return flows in the Basin can be found here. The report "Return of Seepage Water to the Lower South Platte River in Colorado"(7.6MB) also provides historical context.

Hydrology Concepts - Natural, Regulated and Available Flows

Streamflows can represent various conditions. Regulated flow is streamflow that is impacted by humans and corresponds to streamgage measurements that are commonly reported.

Natural flow is streamflow absent the impacts of humans (no reservoirs, no diversions, etc.). Natural streamflow can only be measured where human impacts are absent, such as headwater basins. Natural flow can be estimated from regulated flow by removing human impacts. For example, natural flow can be estimated by subtracting reservoir releases and adding back in diverted flows from ditches and canals. The calculations can be more complex if all hydrologic inputs are considered, such as return flows, evaporation from reservoirs, losses to groundwater aquifers, etc.

Available flow is water that has not been allocated at a point in time and space. For example, high flows in spring may provide enough water to meet all water demands considering water law and excess water is available for additional use. This condition is called “free river” and means that there will be no calls on the river to curtail junior water rights. Available flow may be available at any time when the river can meet all water demands. In a planning study, the amount of available flow indicates the opportunity for additional water development, such as building a reservoir to store the available flow, or implementing an instream flow right to preserve environmental flows.

Hydrographs (see the Hydrographs page of this story), can be used for natural, regulated or available flows, as well as any other subset or aggregation of flow data. The interactive hydrographs at right are for two locations on the South Platte River: higher up in the basin near Elevenmile Canyon Reservoir and near the stateline at Julesburg. Depending on the location and impacts of regulation, natural flows may be larger or smaller than regulated flows. Available flow will accumulate as one moves downstream on a river. Julesburg is near the State line and therefore indicates water that has not been fully utilized in Colorado and is flowing into Nebraska. Agreements between states, called “compacts”, define how much water Colorado must deliver to other states. See the South Platte River Compact.

Analyses of water supplies and the effects of climate change on streamflow are a couple of ways where it may be necessary to estimate natural flows. Estimation of natural flows and understanding conditions in a system typically require utilizing models. Two examples are point flow models and the CDSS StateMod model, which will be discussed in the next section. Additionally, the USGS's StreamStats application provides estimates of streamflow statistics for ungaged (natural) sites.

Modeling Concepts - Point Flow Models

A point flow model is a modeling technique for representing the water balance in a hydrologic system, where calculations are performed at a point in time across all locations in the model. Relatively simple water balance calculations are used to account for diversions and inflows between known flow points, typically streamgages. Point flow models are appropriate for performing simple basin modeling where routing of flow over time can be ignored. The streamflow at every stream gage in the basin is represented in the analysis for a specific point in time.

Point flow models are usually constructed as a system, or network, of nodes and links. The inputs throughout the basin are used to add and subtract flows to perform a water balance. The data outputs from one timestep are then used as inputs across the basin for the next timestep.

The flows calculated from an upstream gage and the diversions and inflows below that gage will typically be different from the measured flows at a downstream gage. The difference between measured and calculated flows indicates measurement error and unaccounted-for inflows and outflows in the stream reach. This difference can be distributed throughout the reach to account for gains and losses between the bounding streamgages. The distribution of gains/losses can be based on stream mile or other mechanism. For example, if the point flow calculations between two streamgages indicate that flow at the lower gage is 100 cfs higher than calculated, the 100 cfs can be distributed across the stream reach between gages, indicating that return flows are occurring. Such return flows vary depending on season and are themselves lagged in time from the original use of the water. Point flow models therefore provide a useful conceptualization of a system without having to model complex interactions.

This visualization is a point flow model for the South Platte River from Kersey to Julesburg, developed by the Lower South Platte Water Conservancy District.

The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (Northern Water) also maintains a daily point flow model for the Cache la Poudre River and other rivers, but it is currently not publicly available.

Modeling Concepts - CDSS and StateMod

Colorado’s Decision Support Systems (CDSS) StateMod model is a tool that represents a river basin using constructs that closely match the water rights system in Colorado. The model represents a river system using a network of nodes, called stations (i.e., streamgage, diversion and well stations). The nodes in the model are associated with other data files, including water rights, return flow tables and time series files indicating historical diversions, demands, etc. StateMod also includes features to represent operational constructs such as exchanges, augmentation plans, terms and conditions and many other operations.

StateMod datasets are created to represent Colorado’s basins to help with planning studies such as evaluating major system changes and climate change. StateMod models are driven by natural streamflow estimated from regulated streamflow, diversions and reservoir releases. Natural streamflows represent water inputs, rather than using precipitation and rainfall/runoff. Consequently, StateMod is a complex accounting model that takes into account the stream network, physical and legal components. StateMod models are typically developed at a monthly timestep, but daily models can be created by estimating daily input time series. StateMod is a complex tool that requires expertise to run. Output is extensive, consisting of large text reports and data files that require additional processing to extract information in useful forms. Results at each node indicate water inflow, outflow and categories of water such as water that is allocated to a water right and available water.

A StateMod model has been developed for the South Platte Basin using data from HydroBase and CDSS data-processing tools. This map shows approximately 500 of the over 1,400 nodes that make up the South Platte Basin StateMod model network (many nodes do not have specific location data associated with them). The nodes shown here consist primarily of stream gages, diversions, reservoirs and wells. StateMod models are implemented as several standard dataset variations representing historical conditions (for model calibration) and baseline conditions (representing current conditions). StateMod has also been used to study scenarios such as climate change by modifying inputs, running the model and comparing results with baseline conditions. Extensive research has occurred to understand how to create the model for specific water supply systems (for example, see the Bijou Irrigation System memo from the South Platte Decision Support System Task 5) and to fill data gaps. Consequently, StateMod datasets provide useful quality-controlled system-level data to understand water resources planning issues.

StateMod models are being used in the Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWSI) Update to estimate current and future available water supplies.

Water Demands - Agriculture

Understanding current and future available water supplies requires understanding the demands that are placed on those supplies. Various entities compete for the Basin's water resources and these entities need water at different times of the year. Agriculture is the largest user of the Basin's water resources, accounting for 85% of total water diversions (Colorado Water Plan, p.3-13).

Agricultural demand for water is typically from May to October, although there is demand in the colder months as irrigation reservoirs are filled to prepare for the following year. Crop irrigation requirements are defined as the depth of water needed to meet the water consumed through evapotranspiration by a disease-free crop, growing in large fields under non-restricting soil conditions including soil water and fertility, and achieving full production potential under the given growing environment. Irrigation requirements vary depending on farming practices, irrigation method and the crops that are grown. Crop water demands at a location will be reduced by local precipitation. However, rain in Colorado is highly variable and does not necessarily occur at the needed location and time. Consequently irrigation is often required.

This visualization shows the irrigation water requirements for crops grown in select locations in eastern Colorado. In general, alfalfa requires the most water, followed by sugar beets (Source: CSU Extension Fact Sheet: Seasonal Water Needs and Opportunities for Limited Irrigation for Colorado Crops).

Some additional considerations are:

  • Crops need water more at specific times, such as when corn tassels appear, in order to ensure maximum yield.
  • Grains generally have more flexibility in irrigation, whereas high-value vegetables have less flexibility in irrigation, hence the value of wells, which can be used at any time if water can be taken.
  • Crop growing seasons are also impacted by weather, such as freezing temperatures and hail, and field conditions that impact the ability to use farm equipment, which may impact when irrigation water is applied.
  • Water deliveries to farms are managed by ditch and reservoir companies, typically in a way that simplifies and optimizes operations, such as rotating deliveries to laterals within a ditch system.

Water Demands - Agriculture

Agricultural producers rely on various data to help make decisions about the upcoming irrigation season, including reservoir storage conditions, snowpack conditions, water rental programs and other information. Water use for each agricultural producer and ditch system depends on the location, conditions and operations of the system, as well as the seniority of their water rights.

When water is diverted from the river to agricultural land, it is done via a system of canals and/or ditches. These systems are not 100 percent efficient, meaning that some water is lost during conveyance. Because of this, there is a need to divert more water from the river than is necessary for crop consumption. Water lost during conveyance, however, is not necessarily truly lost, as it returns to the groundwater and ultimately to the river as return flows for use by downstream water users. Similarly, the amount of return flow varies by the method of irrigation (flood vs. sprinkler vs. drip). Changing irrigation methods has impacts on downstream users and the environment.

This interactive visualization shows diversion records for five ditches in the Basin and illustrates some conditions and circumstances under which ditches divert water for agricultural purposes. To select/deselect a ditch on the plot, click on the ditch in the legend at the bottom.

  • Brantner Ditch: this is an example of a ditch with senior water rights that is able to support the same use nearly every year because of those senior rights. To clearly see this, click on the other ditch names in the legend to "turn off" those ditches so that only Brantner Ditch is shown. Also note that the ditch starts diverting water around the first of April each year.
  • Riverside Canal: this is an example of a ditch that supplements its supply with reservoir storage. This type of ditch can irrigate at "normal" levels, even in drought.
  • Harmony Ditch: this example ditch highlights innovation. This ditch has junior water rights, yet has changed irrigation methods (flood to sprinkler) and the type of crops grown to increase the certainty of producing crops even when water short.
  • Big Thompson Ditch & Manufacturing Company: this is an example of a ditch that has rights to Colorado-Big Thompson (transbasin) water and no independent, off-channel storage. In general, diversions decline as the season progresses, which can be due to a number of reasons, including the types of crops that are grown.
  • S. Boulder Canon Ditch: this is an example of a ditch that frequently experiences shortages. Not only does this ditch divert less water than the other four ditches shown, but it diverts over a shorter time period. Each year, the ditch diverts water for about two months.

Water rights that are used for irrigated agriculture can be transferred to other uses such as municipal use. In this case, only the consumptive use portion of the decree can be transferred to the new use and average historical return flows must be maintained to minimize impacts to downstream water users. Estimating the historical consumptive use based on historical weather data, crops and irrigation practices requires analysis, such as the CDSS StateCU software. The value of agricultural water that might be transferred to a municipality depends on its water right priority date, yield during high demand times of the year and ability to deliver water to the water treatment plant or other location.

Water Demands - Municipalities and Industry

Municipalities and industry are a second category of demand placed on the Basin's water resources. Municipal and industrial water demand tends to be fairly predictable from year to year and season to season in a general sense, although variation does occur. Municipal water demand is fairly constant throughout the year for indoor use but greatly increases for outdoor use in the summer months to water landscaping. Variation from year to year depends on weather and over time is impacted by long-term drivers. Variation within a year depends on weather and specific events.

Water supply planning is typically framed by short-term planning (which considers system water supply firm yield and storage, infrastructure projects that might disrupt supply, short-term disasters, etc.) and long-term planning (which considers population growth, changes in efficiency, climate change, etc.). Planning involves understanding risk (quantifying loss) and uncertainty (recognizing multiple possible outcomes). Drought planning typically takes into consideration that a system has the ability to supply water for a certain amount of time to meet normal demands and that extreme conditions, if severe enough, will result in changes such as water restrictions. For example, a utility may be able to provide normal water deliveries for three years even if a 1-in-50-year drought is occurring. A normal level of operations allows customers to behave normally and ensures a normal level of revenue for the utility.

System reliability and long-term planning typically involve analysis and modeling where multiple scenarios are used as input to understand potential impacts. For example, the worst historical drought (based on low streamflows, snowpack, etc.) may be used as input to a model of the current system to determine whether additional water supplies or changes to operations are needed. Based on the analysis, a water provider such as a utility may decide to acquire additional water supplies as an insurance policy to decrease the certainty of a negative impact, thus reducing risk. Each water provider must perform their own analysis based on their water supply portfolio and local conditions. In Colorado, the worst situation is when a statewide drought occurs that impacts many basins.

The interactive visualization at right shows the total water demands of Denver, Aurora and Boulder. The hydrographs (from StateMod, Total Demand time series) clearly show that water demand almost triples in the summer months for these large municipalities compared to the winter months. Water use data are often provided in municipal water efficiency plans or annual reports. Denver, Aurora and Boulder all have water efficiency plans.

The water depletion from the natural system to meet municipal demand is not fully consumed. Much of the water used for indoor purposes will be returned to streams as treated wastewater effluent and a portion of outdoor irrigation will return to the surface and groundwater system as return flows. Municipalities and industry focus on the first delivery of water to customers, which drives the need to ensure supplies. The term “water use” can therefore be confusing depending on whether demand, depletion or consumptive use are being discussed.

Water Demands - Environment and Recreation

Environmental and recreational needs are a third category of demand placed on the Basin's water resources, but in this case, the demand is to keep water in the river and other water bodies. The South Platte Basin Implementation Plan (BIP) (p.2-25) describes the environmental and recreational attributes that are important to the Basin. These include the protection of habitat for fish species like greenback cutthroat trout and plains fish species like plains minnow, common shiner and stonecat, to name a few. Non-fish species that are considered important include species like boreal toad, yellow mud turtle and river otter. Recreational activities that are considered important to the Basin include fishing and both flatwater and whitewater boating. Protection of the riparian plant community is also important to the Basin. Protection and enhancement of the environment has a direct economic impact as well as contributing to the characteristics of Colorado that residents value and expect.

The protection of these varied environmental and recreational attributes corresponds to the protection of flows that meet these attributes' needs. For example, many fish species require a range of flows to thrive. Flushing (high) flows move sediment downstream, create new habitat and can be cues to spawn. The life stage of the species (larval, juvenile or adult) can also determine the necessary flows. All species need some minimum flow that will ensure they have adequate habitat to survive. Minimum flows are the smallest amounts of flow that will maintain hydraulic parameters for fish habitat, such as specific velocities and water depths. Species can survive low flows and variation in flows but can be severely impacted by conditions in which the magnitude, timing, and/or persistence of flows are outside of biologically-tuned ranges. It is a challenge to quantify required flows for each species and therefore indicator species and/or habitats are often used to monitor and evaluate habitats.

For a given stream reach, the flows necessary to protect environmental and recreational uses can be highly varied and also vary within a year. This interactive visualization shows the flows needed for some environmental and recreational attributes on the South Platte River below Chatfield Reservoir, as well as the streamflow that was actually present during that time. (Source: South Platte BIP Appendix D-2 - Environmental and Recreational Assessment Methodology and Framework). This visualization, while just an example, shows that it can be challenging to meet environmental and recreational flow recommendations in any given year. There are opportunities to meet flow recommendations by reducing demands, managing reservoir storage releases and water deliveries through a reach and changing operations.

The Environmental and Recreational component of the Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWSI) Update is focusing on the development of a Flow Tool, along with an update to the Environmental and Recreational database. This tool will be able to assess flow conditions in each basin and help basin roundtables assess their environmental and recreational flow needs and if those flow needs are being met.

Meeting Demands through Water Management and Administration

Since numerous demands are placed on Colorado's water resources, it is necessary to have a process by which water is administered, managed and regulated. A legal framework called the prior appropriation doctrine regulates the use of surface water in Colorado, as well as tributary groundwater that is connected to streams. This doctrine is also referred to by the phrase "first in time, first in right". This means that in times of short water supply, court-decreed water rights holders who obtained their rights earlier (senior rights) can use water before decreed rights with later dates (junior rights) may use any remaining water. The water user must have a definite plan to divert, store or otherwise capture, possess and control water, and must specify the place of diversion or storage, amount of water, type of use and place of use.

The Colorado Division of Water Resources, which includes the State Engineer, division engineers and water commissioners, has the authority to administer water rights. In particular, water commissioners have the primary task of going into the field and distributing water in priority and according to decreed terms. This involves responding to calls for water, monitoring headgates, issuing orders to reduce or cease diversions and collecting data on diversions. All of this data is collected on a real-time basis via a statewide satellite-linked monitoring system. Here is an example of how a call for water works and how the water commissioner administers the call:

  1. After peak streamflow has been reached due to snowmelt, streamflows start to drop. Some water users in a river may not have sufficient water to fulfill their court-decreed diversion amount. One farmer notices that she does not have enough water to irrigate her farm and places a call to the local ditch official.
  2. The farmer can only call for the amount of water provided in her water right decree and only for the amount that she can actually put to beneficial use (e.g., to irrigate her fields).
  3. The ditch official contacts the water commissioner and places the call. A verbal call can be made but often a formal, written call is required.
  4. The water commissioner verifies that the call is legitimate and then starts looking upstream to shut down all undecreed uses. After this, it is determined that this is not enough water for the farmer.
  5. The water commissioner then limits all decreed upstream users to their decreed amounts of diversion. Yet this is still not enough water for the farmer.
  6. The water commissioner now uses the "first in time, first in right" priority system to look upstream from the farmer's headgate diversion for decreed users with priority dates junior to (more recent than) the farmer's date. These junior users' diversions will be reduced or shut down.
  7. Each decreed junior water user, based on their order of priority, is curtailed until the farmer gets enough water to fulfill her right.
  8. Now the farmer has enough water. However, as streamflows have continued to drop, a municipality downstream of the farmer does not have enough water to fulfill its right, which is senior to the farmer's right. The municipality places a call.
  9. The water commissioner goes through the same process, reducing or shutting down all rights that are junior to the municipality's rights until the municipality's rights are met. This can mean that the farmer may now have to let water flow past her headgate to fulfill the municipality's senior downstream right.
  10. To add more complexity to the process, the priority date of the river call may change daily depending on the streamflow available and the seniority of the diversions that need water on that day.

A water exchange can occur within the prior appropriation system. An exchange allows an upstream diverter to take water that a downstream diverter would otherwise receive, as long as the water is replaced at the same time, place, quantity and quality that the downstream user experienced before the exchange. One consideration is that water exchanges may decrease streamflows in particular stream segments in return for substituting water into stream segments above the water right to which the exchange is made.

The information on this page is derived from the Citizen's Guide to Colorado Water Law. The video at right explains some of the South Platte Basin's water history. (Source: Noah Besser Animations)

Storage - Snowpack and SNOTEL Stations

Colorado's snowpack is impacted by annual weather conditions which, in turn, impacts streamflow runoff and groundwater recharge. As mentioned previously, approximately 80% of river runoff comes from snowmelt. Snowpack is essentially a one-year storage reservoir and has the benefit of being a natural, high-elevation and generally high-quality supply. The amount of water that is generated by the melting of the snowpack is vital for water managers to understand because they must predict yearly water supplies for homes, businesses, farms, etc. There is great concern that climate change will affect the amount, timing and spatial extent of snowpack (see the Climate Change page).

Snowpack is measured by the NRCS’s National Water and Climate Center and a network of Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) stations. Automated remote sensing equipment at these stations (which are located throughout the western U.S.) measure real-time snow and climate data, in particular snow water equivalent (SWE), which is the depth of liquid water contained within the snowpack at a location. The data are available in hourly, daily, monthly and yearly increments; cumulative values can be compared with historical data. The NRCS compiles monthly Colorado Water Supply Outlook Reports from January through June. The April 1 snowpack report is the most-awaited report for water managers because it guides their water supply management strategies for the coming year (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.7).

This graphic is from the NRCS's National Water and Climate Center and shows the snow water equivalent percent for each basin in Colorado at the beginning of April 2018.

Some municipal water providers generate their own water forecasts. For example, Denver Water produces Water Watch Reports. Also see the SNODAS page of this story for information about an additional tool.

Storage - Reservoirs

As has been shown, various users of the Basin's water resources need water at different times of the year and in different amounts. If left to its own means, the snowpack that begins to melt in April would run off quickly into Colorado's rivers and out of the state. Dry conditions during the most of the year produce little water in rivers during the summer and winter months. Historically, the South Platte River naturally dried up for extended stretches during the late summer and early autumn months (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.26). Reservoirs are constructed to maintain a consistent supply of water for municipal, industrial, agricultural and sometimes environmental and recreational uses. Reservoirs essentially regulate river flows: they can increase low flows during dry conditions and reduce flooding flows.

Some reservoirs are operated primarily for drought reserve and can remain substantially full until needed. One example is Eleven Mile Canyon Reservoir. This is the second-largest reservoir in Denver Water's collection system. Note how the reservoir is at or above capacity most of the time. Also note how the drought of 2002 affected the reservoir. Over half of its capacity was used in the later half of 2002 and it took until July 2005 for the reservoir to refill. Denver Water publishes reservoir level data on a daily basis.

Other reservoirs are operated primarily for irrigation and tend to fill in non-irrigation months and drain each year during the irrigation season. An example of this type of reservoir is North Sterling Reservoir, an off-channel reservoir. Reservoir levels typically peak in the spring and then decline as the irrigation season progresses.

Some reservoirs may also provide flood storage, meaning that the reservoir is kept partially empty in order to store flood flows. An example of this type of reservoir is Chatfield Reservoir. Chatfield Reservoir was built in response to flooding in 1965 and has the ability to store floodwaters from the South Platte River and Plum Creek. The Chatfield Storage Reallocation Project is currently being undertaken to reallocate uses of the water. It was determined that the reservoir can accommodate an additional 20,600 acre-feet of water storage for water supply without compromising its flood control function. This additional storage space will be used by municipal and agricultural water users.

Carter Lake is an example of a transbasin reservoir. It is a component of the Colorado-Big Thompson Project (see the Transbasin Diversions page). Several cities, including Longmont, Boulder and Broomfield, receive water from Carter Lake. This water also irrigates farms and ranches in Boulder and Weld counties (Source: Northern Water). A condition for transbasin diversions may be the construction of a “compensatory storage” reservoir that benefits the originating basin, in which case storage is used to provide supply that might originally have come from the natural river. Transbasin diversions often also include storage in the receiving basin in order to re-time flows to meet demands over an entire year.

Reservoirs also provide operational flexibility. For example, a reservoir may release water to meet return flow obligations directly (rather than delayed returns from recharge ponds). Systems that include multiple reservoirs can support exchanges where releases from an upstream reservoir can be provided to an upstream entity in exchange for releases from a downstream reservoir to meet the demands of a downstream entity, although this practice can deplete the intervening reach. Conversely, an upstream reservoir may release water to a downstream reservoir while improving flows in the intervening reach. Reservoirs may include gravel pits. Consequently, an entity such as municipal utility may own storage reservoirs that are below the intakes to their water treatment plants, in order to provide options within the region.

Reservoirs may be constructed on channel or off channel. Resistance to on-channel reservoirs has resulted in new storage projects often being designed as off-channel locations or the expansion of existing on-channel reservoirs. Off-channel reservoirs may require pumping. New reservoirs often include hydropower generation in order to generate electricity and revenue.

New reservoirs and changes to existing reservoirs often seek to meet multiple purposes in order to maximize the benefits of storage. The South Platte Storage Study, completed in 2017, identifies multi-purpose water storage options along the lower South Platte River to capture flows leaving Colorado in excess of the minimum legally required amounts. Water storage possibilities include new reservoirs, the enlargement/rehabilitation of existing reservoirs and alternative storage mechanisms, such as underground storage. Adding significant storage to provide environmental flows is a challenge because funding is often not available to pay for environmental water. The nonprofit Colorado Water Trust is one organization that helps improve flow conditions within the water rights system.

Reservoirs do have issues, including concerns about depleting river flows in order to fill reservoirs, losses due to evaporation from reservoir surfaces, climate impacts of energy use to pump water into storage, changes in water quality and temperature and other issues. These factors and others are considered during the permitting process for a new reservoir.

Storage - Groundwater

Water can also be stored underground in aquifers. One benefit to underground storage is that it can have less of an environmental impact compared to constructing a new surface reservoir. Underground reservoirs also experience little or no evaporation, although plants with long roots can extract water from underground storage.

As mentioned in the Hydrology Concepts - Groundwater page, the South Platte Alluvial Aquifer is one of the largest and most utilized alluvial aquifers in Colorado. The USGS estimates this aquifer stores approximately 8.3 million acre-feet of water (Citizen's Guide to Where Your Water Comes From, p.16). The relationship between surface and ground water is managed according to Colorado water law. Most well water rights are junior to surface water rights. Agricultural producers may prefer to use wells because water can be pumped when needed and may be of higher quality than surface water. In order to pump out of priority, a well must be part of an augmentation plan that replaces the out-of-priority depletion and its impact on the river with some other source, such as releases from a reservoir. The pumping impact on the river is not instantaneous and may, in fact, need to be paid back over many years as part of the augmentation plan. Tracking augmentation plans within a system is one of the costs borne by water providers and their customers, as well as DWR staff.

Denver Water is undertaking an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) study to determine locations where it can potentially inject treated drinking water into underlying aquifers for use in the future. During periods of abundant water supply, Denver Water would take drinking water from water mains and inject it into wells in the Denver Basin aquifer system. The same wells would then pump the water back up from the aquifers when drier conditions are present.

This short video from Denver Water describes more about its ASR project. More information can also be found at Denver Water's website.

Other water providers that use or are experimenting with aquifer storage include Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Town of Castle Rock and East Cherry Creek Valley Water and Sanitation District.

Transbasin Diversions

Transbasin diversions divert water across watershed boundaries, taking water from one stream or river and conveying it into an entirely different watershed. The largest transbasin diversions in Colorado divert water from the west side of the Continental Divide to the east side. Transbasin diversions have been constructed because while 80% of the State's precipitation falls on the West Slope of the Continental Divide, about 90% of the State's population resides in and about 75% of irrigated acreage occurs in the East Slope (Citizen's Guide to Colorado's Transbasin Diversions). In essence, water supply and demand are on opposite sides of the State.

Of the 44 transbasin diversions in the State, 17 divert water into the South Platte Basin. The largest, and likely most familiar, diversions are the Colorado-Big Thompson Project (Northern Water), Roberts Tunnel Collection System (Denver Water) and the Moffat Collection System (Denver Water). Many municipal water providers in the Basin rely on imported water. For example, the Colorado-Big Thompson Project delivers water to 33 municipal entities, including Fort Collins, Boulder and Longmont.

The table below lists the average annual amount of water that is diverted by each transbasin diversion, in acre-feet.

Source: Colorado's Decision Support Systems, HydroBase data with calculations by Open Water Foundation. Also see the Open Water Foundation's transbasin diversion dataset.

The Citizen's Guide to Colorado's Transbasin Diversions provides much more information about transbasin diversions in Colorado.


Drought is a shortage of water associated with a lack of precipitation. It occurs when the normal amount of moisture required to satisfy an area’s usual water consumption is unavailable. Drought can appear slowly and last for many years or it can be a short-lived "flash drought" event. It can occur locally, regionally or statewide. Drought is a regular feature of Colorado's climate but can be very destructive without adequate planning, response and mitigation. Planning is necessary so that when a drought-induced water supply shortage exists, water providers can take actions to lessen the impacts.

The historic 2002 drought was the impetus for the creation of basin roundtables, the Interbasin Compact Committee (IBCC), the Statewide Water Supply Initiative and municipal water efficiency plans.

Many resources exist to assist water providers/users with drought planning. Primarily, users need to know when drought is approaching, typically by understanding the current year's conditions in the context of historical years and by understanding the severity of an ongoing drought with respect to a local system's water demand and supply. The Colorado Water Conservation Board maintains a Drought Response Portal, shown at right, that provides an overall indication of drought status, as well as links to other resources such as a monthly drought update.

See the Hydrology Tools - Drought Monitor page for information about another drought tool.

Climate Change

In 2014, the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) released a report titled "Climate Change in Colorado: A Synthesis to Support Water Resources Management and Adaptation". This, along with the Citizen's Guide to Colorado Climate Change assess how climate change will affect Colorado's water resources. Key points from the CWCB report include the following (p.1-4):

  • All climate model projections indicate future warming in Colorado. The statewide average annual temperatures are projected to warm by +2.5℉ to +5℉ by 2050 relative to a 1971–2000 baseline under a medium-low greenhouse-gas emissions scenario. Under a high emissions scenario, the projected warming is larger at mid-century (+3.5℉ to +6.5℉).
  • No long-term trends in average annual precipitation have been detected across Colorado, even considering the relatively dry period since 2000.
  • Climate model projections show less agreement regarding future precipitation change for Colorado. The individual model projections of change by 2050 in statewide annual precipitation range from -5% to +6% for one model and from -3% to +8% for another model.
  • Snowpack, as measured by April 1 snow-water equivalent (SWE), has been mainly below-average since 2000 in all of Colorado’s river basins, but no long-term (30-year, 50-year) declining trends have been detected.
  • Most model projections of Colorado’s spring snowpack show declines for the mid-21st century due to the projected warming.
  • The timing of snowmelt and peak runoff has shifted earlier in the spring by 1–4 weeks across Colorado’s river basins over the past 30 years, due to the combination of lower SWE since 2000, the warming trend in spring temperatures and enhanced solar absorption from dust-on-snow.
  • The peak of the spring runoff is projected to shift 1–3 weeks earlier by the mid-21st century due to warming. Late-summer flows are projected to decrease as the peak shifts earlier. Changes in the timing of runoff are more certain than changes in the amount of runoff.
  • No long-term statewide trends in heavy precipitation events have been detected. The evidence suggests that there has been no statewide trend in the magnitude of flood events, although climate change is expected to result in more intense storms.
  • Nearly all of the model projections indicate increasing winter precipitation by 2050. There is weaker consensus among the projections regarding precipitation in the other seasons.
  • In the first projections of future Colorado hydrology based on the latest climate model output, most projections show decreases in annual streamflow by 2050 for the San Juan and Rio Grande basins. The projections are more evenly split between future increases and decreases in streamflow by 2050 for the Colorado Headwaters, Gunnison, Arkansas and South Platte basins. However, other hydrology projections show drier outcomes for Colorado, and the overall body of published research indicates a tendency towards future decreases in annual streamflow for all of Colorado’s river basins.

Increasing temperatures will have a significant impact on outdoor water use, irrigated agriculture, and natural vegetation water use, with some estimates of up to 25% more demand, based on higher temperatures and a longer growing season (need citation).

It is difficult to fully quantify the impacts of climate change on water resources. Systems models such as StateMod have been used to simulate river systems using a possible range of precipitation, temperature and related data, in order to understand impacts on water supplies (see the Colorado River Water Availability Study and the Colorado River Water Supply and Demand Study). A general concern among municipal water providers is that the gains due to water conservation will be offset by the impacts of climate change and efforts to develop new water supplies must account not only for certain population growth but uncertain, yet significant, impacts of climate change.

Hydrology Tools - CDSS SNODAS Tools

The CDSS SNODAS Tools, developed for the Colorado Water Conservation Board, provide access to a historical archive of Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS) data products for Colorado water supply basins. SNODAS data are available for the entire state and are calculated from remote-sensed datasets using a grid across Colorado. Consequently, SNODAS snowpack data are available at locations where SNOTEL is not available. SNODAS data from the National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC) are processed daily to calculate Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) and Snow Coverage statistics for water supply basins in Colorado. Snow Water Equivalent is the estimate of the depth of liquid water contained within the snowpack. Snow coverage is a percent of the basin land surface covered by snow (water bodies in the basin are ignored). Mean SWE is displayed in the map using a legend similar to the National Weather Service. Acre-feet estimates of available SWE for local basins and cumulative upstream basins can be used by water supply planners to better understand water supply conditions.

Instructions for using this SNODAS tool can be found under the "About" tab in the upper left corner.

Hydrology Tools - Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI)

The Surface Water Supply Index(SWSI, not to be confused with the Statewide Water Supply Initiative) developed by the Division of Water Resources based on Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) methodology is used as an indicator of mountain-based water supply conditions in the major river basins and sub-basins of the state. The SWSI compares the total volume of water in a basin or sub-basin against the volume available in the same month of historical years. Depending on the month, the volume is a combination of streamflow, streamflow forecast and reservoir storage.

To view the live SWSI map layer in the CDSS Map Viewer, click here. Check the "Surface Water Supply Index" layer. Expand the layer by clicking on the + on the left of the layer name. Then click on the legend icon to see the categories of conditions.

Hydrology Tools - Drought Monitor

The U.S. Drought Monitor is a weekly map of drought conditions produced jointly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (NDMC-UNL). The map is based on measurements of climatic, hydrologic and soil conditions as well as reported impacts and observations from more than 350 contributors around the country. To see a live version of the map shown at right, click here.

Drought severity is classified as the following:

  • D0 - abnormally dry
  • D1 - moderate drought
  • D2 - severe drought
  • D3 - extreme drought
  • D4 - exceptional drought

To view the current status of the South Platte Basin, click on the "Data" tab, then choose "Time Series". Under "Area type" click "HUC (6 digit)", then under "Area", choose "101900 (South Platte)". Note that this is the entire South Platte Basin and therefore incorporates other states.


This story was created by the South Platte Data Platform project, funded by the CWCB. The story content is intended to provide useful context for South Platte and Metro Roundtable members and help educate the public. The topics discussed in this story could be analyzed in more detail, which would allow story sections to be updated and/or additional links to be included.


This Hydrology story has been created during the South Platte Data Platform Project. This story and all of its content can be found at the swsi-story-sp-hydrology repository on GitHub. See the README file in the repository for an explanation of data sources and processing.

Additional information can be found at the following:

Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWSI) 2004 (PDF) and SWSI 2010

SWSI Update

South Platte Basin Implementation Plan (PDF)

Colorado Water Plan


South Platte Basin Roundtable

Metro Basin Roundtable

Colorado Water Conservation Board Water Supply Planning Section

Questions or feedback? Contact Lacey Williams (lacey@coloradowater.org).

Last update: October 15, 2018


Water cycle image available from the U.S. Geological Survey.

Lake Haiyaha in Rocky Mountain National Park and Cherry Creek in Denver available from Pixabay.


This story is designed to provide information in one-page sections, each of which should fit within the web browser page. To move forward or backward in the story, use the following options:

  • Page Up and Page Down keys
  • Arrow Up and Arrow Down keys
  • Mouse scroll wheel - a slight turn will advance the page automatically
  • Menu at the top of the story to navigate to major sections
  • Click on the dots on the right side of the screen - hover over a dot to see the title of the page

Additional instructions for viewing the story include:

  • The content is best viewed on a relatively large display and has not been optimized for mobile devices.
  • If content does not seem to fit in the browser window, maximize the window size or use Ctrl - to reduce font sizes. Ctrl + can be used to increase font sizes.
  • For interactive maps, the default behavior for the mouse scroll is to advance the story page. Click on the mouse icon () in the map to change mouse scrolling to zoom behavior. Once changed, the behavior will apply only to the specific map.
  • Interactive maps can be repositioned by holding the left mouse button and dragging the map.
  • Scrollable text areas are provided in some pages and can be scrolled by dragging the text area scroll bar.
  • External pages are indicated with a graphic and will be shown in a separate tab when selected.
  • Links to sections within the story and external pages are generally the same font color as normal text but are indicated with underlines.
  • Visualizations that will slow down the story are linked to as separate pages and will be shown in a different tab when selected. Mouse over the image to see a popup link to the separate page.
  • Interactive maps provide popups to view data. If the popup flashes, drag the map to reposition it so that the popup does not occur in the same area as the map instruction box.
  • Some maps allow clicking on map markers to access links to additional data.

Interactive graphs typically behave as follows:

  • Zoom into the graph either by holding the left mouse button and drawing a rectangle on the graph or by clicking/holding/dragging the buttons on either end of the time slider in the overview graph below the main graph.
  • Once the time slider "window" (light blue shaded area in the overview graph) has been narrowed, use the mouse to drag the shaded area to another time period. Or, click in the overview graph on either side of the shaded area to center the graph period on the clicked point.
  • To fully zoom out, drag the ends of the shaded area in the overview graph to the margins of the graph.
  • All time series can be selected or deselected by clicking on the "Select All Series" or "Deselect All Series" buttons below the graph. It is also possible to individually select or deselect one time series at a time by clicking on the time series name in the legend.